Here you will find a variety of relevant publications, op-eds, events, and podcasts published by ourselves and others.
Remote warfare is only remote for some. While politicians portray it as riskless, algorithmic targeting and ‘precision’ airstrikes often lead to widescale civilian casualties. These casualties are often denied, kept secret or undercounted to maintain the myth of a clean war. In response, a growing community of scholars and NGOs have utilised remote-sensing techniques to monitor civilian harm. The resulting contestation of the exact numbers of civilian casualties has provoked intense debate. This raises pressing questions about the impact of the violence executed and democratic control.
Collateral damage: Crushing the myths of accuracy and accountability in modern warfare
Strategic ignorance and the legitimation of remote warfare: The Hawija bombardments
IRW, PAX, and Airwars conduct joint research project on civilian harm in Hawija
Remote Warfare: Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Book launch & panel discussion: On Civilian Harm
After Hawija: The Way Forward for the Dutch Ministry of Defence
The conversation about civilian harm is our responsibility
Voices from Hawija: Listening six years later
Today marks 6 years exactly since the Dutch airstrike on Hawija. Researchers at IRW Isa Zoetbrood and Guusje Bloemen together with Ali Maleki, research consultant at PAX for peace, introduce our joint ongoing research with local partner Al-Ghad that investigates the civilian harm effects of the airstrike.